点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
【新时代新征程新伟业】发挥央企担当 “中化学力量”助力赣南苏区振兴发展******
中新网赣州12月17日电 题：发挥央企担当 “中化学力量”助力赣南苏区振兴发展
作者 吴鹏泉 罗鲜梅
挖掘机的“钢铁臂膀”不停挥舞、工程车辆在工地上来回穿梭、旋挖钻的轰鸣作业声此起彼伏……仲冬时节，走进赣粤产业合作区(南康片区)标准厂房及配套基础设施项目施工现场，一派热火朝天的建设场景。
据承建方中化学南方建投(江西)有限公司赣粤产业园项目经理李鹏介绍，该项目于今年8月开始建设，主要包括科创中心、标准厂房、市政配套基础设施、场地回填平整4个子项目，估算总投资5.81亿元。整个项目建成后，将有力助推赣南苏区积极承接粤港澳大湾区产业转移。
赣粤产业合作区(南康片区)标准厂房及配套基础设施项目，是中化学南方建投(江西)有限公司助力赣南苏区振兴发展的一个生动缩影。
为改善民众居住环境，江西赣州市南康区推动实施了东山街道棚户区改造安置房建设项目。 杨晓明 摄2020年4月7日，中化学南方建投(江西)有限公司在赣州市南康区注册成立，同月28日即受邀参加国务院国资委与江西省政府共同举办的“贯彻落实振兴赣南等原中央苏区振兴战略暨央地合作视频会”，会议现场与赣州市南康区政府签订家具集聚区标准厂房建设项目二期投资合作协议，负责该区5个家具集聚区标准厂房F+EPC项目建设。
中化学南方建投(江西)有限公司党委书记、董事长米伟秀介绍，该公司落户赣南苏区后，先后中标了多个项目，涉及基础设施建设、棚户区改造、民生工程、乡村振兴等多领域。
房屋老旧、道路狭窄、垃圾成堆……“脏乱差堵”曾是赣州市南康区东山街道东山社区居民吴福平对小区居住环境的深刻记忆，“电线杂乱密布，像蜘蛛网一样；路面坑坑洼洼，下雨天污水到处乱流”。
民以居为安，棚户区改造是加快经济发展、实现民众安居乐业的民心工程。为改善民众居住环境，南康区推动实施了东山街道棚户区改造安置房建设项目。
“棚改房建成后，可容量住户能达到778户。”站在机声隆隆、塔吊林立的工地上，中化学南方建投(江西)有限公司东山街道棚户区改造安置房建设项目安全总监牛付州告诉记者，项目部高标准规划、高品质建设、加速度推进，确保项目按期交付。
“从拆迁到现在，房子建得很快，希望早日住进新房子里。”经常来工地看看施工进度的吴福平，对入住新房后的生活充满期待。
距离东山街道棚户区改造安置房建设项目约5公里的南康区文化强国馆项目，同样在加紧建设中。这是赣州市城镇文化旅游基础设施建设及配套产业提升重点项目。
图为赣州市南康区文化强国馆项目在加紧建设中。 杨晓明 摄中化学南方建投(江西)有限公司文化强国馆项目副经理周代飞介绍，项目主体钢结构工程层高较高、柱间距大、造型复杂，属于大空间异性钢结构施工。为保证钢结构工程顺利进行，项目部对加工产能、质量及工艺等方面严格把关。“项目施工后，给当地创造了不少就业岗位。”
47岁的邓同全家住南康区隆木乡，今年9月份来到文化强国馆项目上务工，从事泥工工作，“之前在南康接一些零零散散的活，收入很不稳定，现在在工地上干活，每天能挣几百块哩！”
米伟秀表示，中化学南方建投(江西)有限公司承建的一个个重大项目落地建设，为江西赣州加快建设革命老区高质量发展示范区贡献了央企力量。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)